Application Development
Enterprise SPAs built on a module structure that scales with the team.
- Standalone components and modules
- Routing and lazy loading
- RxJS state management
Angular suits large applications with many developers and long lifespans. RASPSYS builds them with the module structure, typing and testing that keep a big codebase navigable.
Angular rewards discipline. The structure you set in the first month decides whether year three is pleasant or painful.
Enterprise SPAs built on a module structure that scales with the team.
A shared library so teams stop rebuilding the same controls.
Custom interfaces over Salesforce and other CRM data.
Fast first load and smooth interaction on real hardware.
Coverage that makes large refactors survivable.
Move off an old Angular version without stopping delivery.
A structured engagement model that de-risks delivery and gets working output into your team's hands early.
We agree scope, users and what the first shippable release contains.
Architecture, navigation and API contracts settled before building.
Iterative development with review at the end of each slice.
Device, performance and accessibility testing before release.
Store submission, monitoring and post-launch support.
Most engagements start with a short discovery call. RASPSYS LLP will compare Angular and React honestly for your situation.
We deliver for clients across the UK, US, UAE, Canada, and Australia - with teams that work in your time zone.
We set module and state conventions before feature work begins.
Supporting product teams across the UK, US, UAE, Canada and Australia.
Keyboard, screen reader and contrast testing during the build, not after.
The questions we are asked most often about Angular Development.
Angular suits large teams and long-lived enterprise applications: it is opinionated, strongly typed and ships routing, forms and HTTP in the box, so teams make fewer divergent choices. React is lighter and more flexible, which suits smaller teams and faster-moving products. We build both and pick per project rather than by preference.
Yes. Angular has a defined upgrade path and a migration tool, so version-to-version moves are usually mechanical. The work concentrates in deprecated APIs and third-party libraries that stopped being maintained. AngularJS to modern Angular is a different proposition - effectively a rewrite, best done incrementally.
Yes, through the REST API with OAuth. For customer-facing portals that is often the right pattern. If the interface belongs inside Salesforce itself, Lightning Web Components are usually the better choice because they are native to the platform.
We recommend it for anything beyond a single application. A shared library with Storybook documentation stops four teams building four slightly different date pickers, and it is where most of the long-term maintenance saving comes from.
Software projects fail on communication far more often than on technology. These are the outcomes our clients see, and the commitments behind them.
If that is how you want to work with a delivery partner, the next step is a short conversation — no pitch deck, no obligation.
Of RASPSYS clients continue working with us beyond their first engagement, most on an ongoing support or development arrangement.
Average reduction in ongoing admin overhead once we consolidate duplicated automation and strip out the manual steps nobody should still be doing.
Typical time from scope call to a working first release, because we ship in slices rather than disappearing for a quarter.
Weekly active use six months after go-live, by designing around how your team actually works rather than around the platform defaults.
Fewer inbound tickets after self-service and documentation replace the questions that kept coming back.
Book a free 30-minute call with a RASPSYS consultant.
We will discuss your application and the right structure for your team size.