Smart Contract Development
Solidity contracts written to be audited, not just deployed.
- Solidity and EVM development
- Gas optimisation
- Upgrade and proxy patterns
Most problems presented as blockchain problems are solved better by a database. RASPSYS builds distributed ledger solutions where trustlessness or shared-state verification actually matter — and says so when they do not.
We will tell you early if a conventional database solves your problem for a tenth of the cost. That conversation saves more money than the build.
Solidity contracts written to be audited, not just deployed.
Front-ends that make a contract usable by non-specialists.
Permissioned ledgers for multi-party business processes.
The failure mode here is irreversible, so review is not optional.
Connect on-chain events to the business systems that must react.
Supply chain and provenance where multiple parties must agree.
A structured engagement model that de-risks delivery and gets working output into your team's hands early.
We agree the requirement, the users and what a first shippable slice looks like.
Architecture, data model and interface contracts settled before building.
Iterative development with automated tests written alongside.
Performance, security and cross-browser or cross-device testing.
Documentation, deployment config and team enablement.
Most engagements start with a short feasibility call. RASPSYS LLP will tell you plainly if a conventional solution serves you better.
We deliver for clients across the UK, US, UAE, Canada, and Australia - with teams that work in your time zone.
We have talked clients out of blockchain projects. A database is often the right answer.
Deployed contract bugs cannot be patched away; review happens before deployment.
Supporting clients across the UK, US, UAE, Canada and Australia.
The questions we are asked most often about Blockchain Development.
Often not, and we would rather say so at the proposal stage. Blockchain earns its cost when multiple parties who do not fully trust each other must agree on shared state without a central authority. If one organisation controls the data, a database with a good audit log is cheaper, faster and easier to operate.
For enterprise processes, almost always permissioned - Hyperledger Fabric or similar - because you need known participants, privacy between parties and predictable costs. Public chains make sense when you need open verifiability or are issuing a public asset.
By treating deployment as irreversible, because it is. Contracts get internal review against the known failure classes - reentrancy, integer issues, access control, oracle manipulation - plus comprehensive test coverage. For anything holding meaningful value we recommend an independent third-party audit before mainnet.
More than an equivalent conventional build, which is why the first question matters. A focused smart contract with a front-end typically runs 10-16 weeks; a permissioned consortium network is a larger programme because governance between parties takes longer to agree than the technology does to build.
Book a free 30-minute call with a RASPSYS consultant.
We will assess the use case honestly, including whether a database would do.