React Native Development
One JavaScript/TypeScript codebase targeting both platforms.
- React Native and Expo
- Shared business logic
- Native module bridging
Cross-platform halves the build cost when the app is mostly screens, forms and API calls. RASPSYS is clear about where it stops paying — and builds native when that line is crossed.
The saving is real but it is not 50% forever. Platform-specific work always appears; we scope for it rather than pretending otherwise.
One JavaScript/TypeScript codebase targeting both platforms.
Dart and a single rendering engine for consistent UI across platforms.
Shared code that still feels right on each platform.
Connect to Salesforce, your API and push services.
One codebase still needs testing on two platforms.
Both submissions, with their different rules.
A structured engagement model that de-risks delivery and gets working output into your team's hands early.
We agree scope, users and what the first shippable release contains.
Architecture, navigation and API contracts settled before building.
Iterative development with review at the end of each slice.
Device, performance and accessibility testing before release.
Store submission, monitoring and post-launch support.
Most engagements start with a short discovery call. RASPSYS LLP will compare it against native for your actual requirements.
We deliver for clients across the UK, US, UAE, Canada, and Australia - with teams that work in your time zone.
We will tell you when your requirements have outgrown cross-platform.
Supporting product teams across the UK, US, UAE, Canada and Australia.
We handle submission, review feedback and the metadata that affects discovery.
The questions we are asked most often about Cross Platform App Development.
React Native if your team already writes React and TypeScript - the skills transfer directly and hiring is easier. Flutter if visual consistency across platforms matters most and you are comfortable with Dart; its rendering approach gives more pixel control. Both are mature; the deciding factor is usually your existing team.
When the app depends heavily on platform capability - sustained background processing, complex camera or sensor work, tight OS integration like widgets and watch apps - or when performance is the product. Also when you genuinely need the newest platform features on day one, since cross-platform support always lags.
Meaningfully, but not half. Expect roughly 60-70% of a dual-native build. Shared business logic and screens save the most; platform-specific behaviour, store compliance and testing on both platforms still cost what they cost. Anyone promising 50% has not scoped the platform work.
Yes, through the REST API with OAuth, exactly as a native app would. We have built field-service and sales apps on this pattern. The considerations - governor limits, offline sync, token refresh - are the same regardless of framework.
Software projects fail on communication far more often than on technology. These are the outcomes our clients see, and the commitments behind them.
If that is how you want to work with a delivery partner, the next step is a short conversation — no pitch deck, no obligation.
Of RASPSYS clients continue working with us beyond their first engagement, most on an ongoing support or development arrangement.
Average reduction in ongoing admin overhead once we consolidate duplicated automation and strip out the manual steps nobody should still be doing.
Typical time from scope call to a working first release, because we ship in slices rather than disappearing for a quarter.
Weekly active use six months after go-live, by designing around how your team actually works rather than around the platform defaults.
Fewer inbound tickets after self-service and documentation replace the questions that kept coming back.
Book a free 30-minute call with a RASPSYS consultant.
We will scope the app and tell you if cross-platform genuinely fits.